China’s DeepSeek is all the tech world can talk about now. But the chatbot has a censorship problem. It refuses to answer questions on sensitive subjects. When asked about Tiananmen Square or Winnie the Pooh,

Hong Kong stocks jumped following a positive phone call between Chinese President Xi Jinping and US president-elect Donald Trump. The Hang Seng Index added 1.7 per cent to 19,917.38 as of 9.50am ...

In a ceremony to mark the 25th anniversary held on July 1 in Hong Kong, Chinese President Xi Jinping asserted that under the one country, two systems framework, “safeguarding national ...

President Xi Jinping and other top leaders visited or deputed others to visit 130 ex-officials ahead of annual holiday, Xinhua reports.

China’s controversial ChatGPT rival, DeepSeek, has taken the world by storm with its powerful AI capabilities, yet its evasive responses on sensitive political topics raise serious concerns.

In Australia, the S&P/ASX 200 Index is up 0.18% at 8,325.50, recovering from losses in the previous session. Gains are led by iron ore miners and technology stocks, while gold miners weigh on the index.

Chinese tech startup DeepSeek ’s new artificial intelligence chatbot has sparked discussions about the competition between China and the U.S. in AI development

Prompted by this reporter, the artificial intelligence model says it must uphold ‘core values of socialism,’ rejects compromising questions about Xi Jinping and Tiananmen Square, and apparently doesn’

The Chinese AI startup DeepSeek's R1 model has disrupted tech and energy sectors especially in the US, challenging assumptions about AI development costs and energy consumption.

Social media exploded in a celebration after the news that a Chinese start-up had made an artificial intelligence tool that was more efficient than any in the United States.

Explore the diplomatic tensions as China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi warns U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a recent phone call.

Starmer’s Government is re-making the age-old mistakes in China diplomacy all over again. Those who frame the debate as a choice between whether or not to engage Beijing are proposing a false dichotomy. It is not about whether to talk or trade with China, but how? On whose terms, with what criteria, on what conditions and with what objectives?