The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their ...

An adult with mental retardation who commits a murder should be held legally accountable (assuming the retardation is not so profound as to render him or her incompetent to stand trial). But ...

JURIST Senior Editor Elizabeth Imbarlina, University of Pittsburgh School of Law Class of 2014, argues that the US Supreme Court’s reasoning in Miller v. Alabama can be extended to abolish life in ...

Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting. By I. Beverly Lake Jr. Henry McCollum sits as applause rings out in a Robeson County ...

In Miller v. Alabama, the United States Supreme Court, announced a legal principle that social science, neuroscience and common sense had long recognized: juveniles have “diminished culpability and ...

Senior Counsel Andrew Pilgrim said Roach’s level of culpability was low as a result of his diminished responsibility, while State Counsel Paul Prescod countered the level was high, despite the State ...

Conviction for even a very serious crime does not extinguish a child offender’s claim to just treatment at the hands of the state, nor does it free the state to ignore the offender’s fundamental ...