1. Manual testing is cheaper than automation testing for small projects. Smaller undertakings don’t have heaps of functionalities, and the volume regression is usually low.

The average speed of automated testing is about five times that of its manual counterpart. This impacts your delivery velocity, deadlines, team dynamics, stress, and employee burn-out.

When automated tests are performed, very little human intervention is required. In turn, the test script can only act as it is configured. So sometimes script can omit mistakes that would be obvious ...

Automated testing is an integral part of the continuous delivery pipeline. Despite its benefits, in reality most organizations still use outdated manual testing processes. In one survey by XBOsoft ...

Find out whether automation works better than manual concrete testing in the construction industry.

While automated testing can help with many challenges, there is also a learning curve to getting started.

A new study from Kobiton found nearly 100% of software testers use automation, and managers prefer new hires with automation experience.

Automated testing initiatives still lag behind in many organizations as increasingly complex testing environments are met with a lack of skilled personnel to set up tests.

Automated pentest delivery replaces static PDFs with real-time workflows, cutting remediation delays and reducing MTTR.

DevOps and true “shift left” testing environments demand structure and flexibility throughout operations that can only be achieved through standardization and automation.